McCain/Palin leads the race, probably

Zogby says[*1] .

Summary:  McCain/Palin favored by somewhere between 47.6% and 51.8% of the population.
Obama/Biden is favored by somewhere between 43.8% and 48.0% of the population.

(Zogby reports 49.7%-45.9% with a 2.1% margin for error.  I just added the margin of error to the two median numbers to show the range–which is actually the correct way of interpreting a poll.)

California judge rules simian right to marry

Or, perhaps not.  Anyway, story at IMAO[*1] .

The majority opinion, by Chief Justice Ronald M. George, declared that any law that discriminates on the basis of species will from this point on be constitutionally suspect in California in the same way as laws that discriminate by race or gender, making the state’s high court the first in the nation to adopt such a stringent standard. The decision was a bold surprise from a moderately conservative, Republican-dominated court that legal scholars have long dubbed “cautious,” and experts said it was likely to influence other courts around the country.

This is a test.  A humor test.  Did you pass?  It’s OK to admit you didn’t.  After all, it doesn’t mention pigs or fish or anything like that.

Yeah, Obama is losing it

Direct quote from the O:  “You can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig.”

O didn’t get the original joke, I guess.  I’m not surprised.  He does seem a pretty humorless fellow, really.  And the polls lately aren’t anything he would smile about.

UPDATE:  Obama’s campaign says “no, we didn’t call Palin a pig.  And we didn’t call McCain an old fish.  And we certainly didn’t have Palin in mind when we wrote a two-line joke about pigs and smelly fish.  Really.  Would we lie?”  (Not their exact words, but I think they faithfully carry the gist of what they’re saying.)

Note to Obama and his campaign:  If you have to explain the joke, chances are it wasn’t a good joke in the first place.

Fairly recent history

Let’s see . . . Franklin Roosevelt created the Federal National Mortgage Agency (“Fannie Mae”) in 1938 at the very tail end of FDR’s “New Deal.”

Lyndon Johnson partially privatized the FNMA in 1968, to take it “off the budget.”  I say “partially” because although the corporation was divorced from direct public control, it was still implicitly backed by the Federal Treasury, yet FNMA as well as it’s partner in white-collar crime, Freddie Mac, were not required to make the same kind of public accounting records that all truly private corporations must do.

FNMA took 70 years to fail, with the result that almost all of the American mortgage industry is practically nationalized.

Nationalized.  Brought under government control.

So, remember the Fannie, when talking about Social Security, or nationalized health care.  The clock is ticking on Social Security.  Can we afford to bail out that New Deal mistake, too?  Can we afford to make another New Deal-class mistake with one-sixth of the nation’s economy–health care?

I don’t think so.

It isn’t privatizing Social Security, or radical reform of Medicare which should be off the table–it’s allowing the Federal Government to control even more of the nation’s retirement or health care systems than they already do.

It is past time to start phasing out New Deal, command-economy policies and programs, and start implementing 21st-Century, Information-Age, market-oriented policies and programs instead.

The last person to post on yesterday’s McCain-Palin rally

I suspect I have somehow managed to become the last person to blog on yesterday’s McCain/Palin rally in Lee’s Summit, Missouri (my cozy and comfortable home town).

At this point, I suppose I just need to prove that I was there.  But since I always have a mental block against such things, I took no pictures of myself or of Snookums, standing in that enormous snaking line going into the John Knox Village Pavillion.

The rally itself was . . . OK, I guess.  I think I’m not a rally-kind of person.  It was all interesting and everything, but it’s not really an experience I need to repeat.

So, on to the pictures and, a first for Medary.com, our very own YouTube videos of the event.  They’re crappy, hard-to-watch, kinda hard-to-hear videos, but what the heck, I had to play with my new camera (which, of course, I still owe my eight readers a review of).  So much Internet to surf, so little time . . .

We’re in the right place
Taking a picture of Fox 4’s standup
A small part of the long line to get in
The Straight Talk Express, departing

Palin’s stump speech, in two parts (warning, really bad quality, but hey, it’s my first try at YouTubing a public event. I’ve got a lot of room to improve. Anyway, here it is:


I was going to post McCain’s stump speech video here, too, but for some reason the two parts didn’t get uploaded to YouTube. Trust me, it’s probably for the best.  The video quality is equal in crummyness to the Palin videos. Oh well.  Progress is sometimes measured in learning what NOT to do.

Still, I came home with a McCain yard sign.  (No Palin on it, just McCain.  Grr.)  It isn’t up yet, but I’ve got Snookums to agree to let me put it up.  That’s why I married that gal!  (Well no, not really, but it helps, I guess.)

Others who blogged the Lee’s Summit rally:

Dee at Conservatism With Heart[*1]

NiceDeb at, er, NiceDeb who, all in all, did a much better job than I did.

Oh, by the way, I called Palin as McCain’s VP

Ten days ahead of time, on FreeRepublic[*1] .

Here are my Palin posts, before McCain’s introduction of her as his running mate on August 29th:

The bold parts are the ones where I’m particularly prescient, I think . . .

Tuesday, August 19:
Palin is, I think, my preference for McCain’s VP.

Whitman would be a bit more of a “hail mary” (forgive the confused but somehow apt analogy) that McCain might have needed if he was already down 5-10 points. But he’s not—he’s even, possibly even a bit ahead of Obama right now.

Palin keeps what’s left of his conservative base intact, but still gives all those PUMA Hillary supporters an affirmative-action reason to look at punching the R chad in November.

So, Palin for me.

Saturday, August 23:
I’m still rooting for Palin . . . Romney isn’t a game-changing choice, in my opinion. Palin really upsets the dynamics of the campaign, I think.

For those who say Palin doesn’t have the experience—I think she’s got more experience than Obama for the job. She’s actually RUN a government, unlike him. Palin on McCain’s ticket just further highlights how little real experience Obama has.

Plus, the vision of ol’ Grins-and-Lies Biden getting nasty and snippy and condescending with Palin at the VP debate would be worth it. And you KNOW in your heart that he wouldn’t be able to avoid doing it, either.

Later on Saturday, Aug. 23:
I think of the relative quality of the R VP candidates vs. the crew that Obama had to choose from, and remark that McCain is in the enviable position of choosing which parts of his campaign to enhance, while Obama had to choose which of his weaknesses he had to shore up. He picked foreign policy (with good reason). Now, judging from the guffaws from the rightie-blogs and the moaning from the leftie-blogs, it’s apparent that Biden really doesn’t give Obama very much.

Personally, I favor the bump and buzz that I think McCain would get from Palin, but Romney, Pawlenty, or some of the other front-runners have definite electoral strengths, too. I just see Palin as a game-changing, strategic pick (take a few percent of the most pissed-off PUMAs and a few more of the soccer/security moms), while the others would be more typical tactical Electoral College picks.

The one highly amusing thing Palin does is highlight just exactly how inexperienced Obama is—I mean, even Palin, with her rather short resume, has more meaningful governmental executive experience than Obama and Biden combined do.

But I’ll be happy with any of a number of potential R VP’s. It’s just that Palin’s potential to drive the D’s into an absolute pretzel of hypocritical contortions pleases me greatly.

They oughta pay me for this . . . assuming of course that I wanted gainful employment!

Bill Whittle–a Must Read

Bill Whittle writes at National Review Online on Sarah Palin, writing an article with which I’m approximately 99.34% in agreement.

Go read the whole article[*1] .  But here, and below (click the Read More) are tidbits:

. . . John McCain . . . wasn’t my first choice (Fred) or my second (Rudy), . . .

And so — prior to this week — all we had was a grim determination to vote against a dangerous, socialized vision of the future. We were portrayed — largely accurately — as old, tired, out-of-touch, out of ideas, out of candidates . . . too white, too male, too square. It doesn’t matter how true or false that caricature was. That was the narrative, and there was enough of it that fit.

And then the earthquake came.

More by Whittle:

Sarah Palin is the anti-Obama: not a victim, not a poser, not riding a wave but rather swimming upstream — and most of all, not having run for president her entire life. She is the first politician I have ever seen — and I include Ronnie in this, God bless him — who strikes everyone who sees her as an actual, real, ordinary person. Immediately came T-shirts saying I AM SARAH PALIN. HER STORY IS MY STORY. There is a lot of Obama swag out there, too, but none of it says HIS STORY IS MY STORY. Hold that thought till November 5.

. . . I think the magic of Sarah Palin speaks to a belief that so many of us share: the sense that we personally know five people in our immediate circle who would make a better president than the menagerie of candidates the major parties routinely offer. Sarah Palin has erupted from this collective American Dream — the idea that, given nothing but classic American values like hard work, integrity, and tough-minded optimism you can actually do what happens in the movies: become Leader of the Free World, the President of the United States of America. (Or, well, you know, vice president.)

. . .

John McCain got me to believe tonight what I never really believed about him before: he is serious about changing Washington. He is serious about getting the GOP back to basics. John McCain wants to repair the brand.

. . .

And a final thing: I had heard before that John McCain had been beaten in prison, and I admired him for it. But when he said he had been broken . . . I gasped. When this sometimes cocky, arrogant old man told me he had once been a cocky, arrogant young man until he was “blessed by hardship,” until he had been broken and remade — and in that remaking discovered a love of country so fierce and pure that even as a patriot myself I will never approach it — well, in that moment John McCain won my heart, to add to the respect and admiration he had already had.

If you want to understand how many of us feel about McCain/Palin, you would do well to read Bill Whittle’s article.  Even if you’re behind Obama, but consider yourself a person who can still be engaged by argument and reason, you’ll take a look at Whittle’s article, if nothing else to see what motivates those on the other side of the political fence.

It will be no surprise to regular readers here that was planning to vote for McCain out of a weary sense of duty–to stand against the continuing encroachment of the smiley-faced Marxism/fascism upon our country.  I still stand against that, regardless of whether it’s the Democratic Party version, or the Republican Party version.

But this year, this election, it is McCain/Palin who offers to me the best hope of standing against the march of communitarianism/collectivism and standing for individual freedom and liberty.  And finally, they offer me real hope–not just the usual hazy, knee-jerk, cliched Republican rhetoric.  Change is indeed in the air, and it’s a change that I can believe in.  At last.

I would respect a serious argument about why I’m wrong.  But I won’t respect–can not respect–the uncritical near-worship of Barack Obama and the resulting holy jihad against any who would stand against him.

I am Sarah Palin.

Simianblogging sadly returns

The world’s oldest gorilla–well, the oldest one in captivity, named Jenny, has died at 55[*1] at the Dallas Zoo.

Democrats immediately blamed it on Sarah Palin’s opposition to socialized health care and cited her record of hunting cute furry animals.  John McCain said “I know what it’s like to live in captivity for years” in a written statement.