Month: March 2006

NCAA Responds to Shrill CBS

If you saw the NCAA Basketball Tournament Selection Show last Sunday on CBS, you saw NCAA Selection Chairman Craig Littlepage suffering a classic 60-Minutes-Style drive-by media lynching from CBS’ Billy Packer and Jim Nantz. Packer and Nantz were outraged that the “mid-major” Missouri Valley Conference placed four teams in the tournament, the same number as the media darlings in the Atlantic Coast Conference, Big East, Big 10, and other “major” conferences.

Now, it’s Littlepage’s turn[*1] :

But what riled Littlepage was Packer’s assertion the committee look at a five-year track record of teams and conferences. Littlepage and past committee chairmen have stated regularly that past performances have no bearing on the brackets.

And Littlepage said the reason teams from the traditional power conferences fare better in the tournament is that they typically get higher seeds.

“He may have an opinion about that or the two of them may have an opinion about that, and they are certainly free to have those opinions and express those opinions,” Littlepage said of Packer and his CBS broadcast partner, Jim Nantz. “But to look at this in terms of the partnership, you would hope there would be a little better understanding of what it is that we do and an accurate reflection of the facts as they know them to be. Facts, instead of opinions, would be helpful.”

Via YOCO[*2] .

Woah, Momma, That’s Some Mango!

Woman Shows Off Five-Pound Monster Mango[*1] , from Yahoo News:

When Colleen Porter took her mango to the local grocer, it wasn’t to sell it, but to weigh it and show it off. Colleen Porter, already a state mango record holder, has been confirmed by the Guinness Book of World Records as growing the world’s heaviest mango — 5 pounds, 7 ounces. The monster mango appears to be close to the size of a human head.

Game Theory vs. Demagoguery

Not surprisingly, jingoistic demagoguery wins, in the real world. Unfortunately, that probably means we all lose in the long run.

Christopher Chantrill at The American Thinker:

Back in 1984 Robert Axelrod[*1] from the University of Michigan announced a competition to devise an iterative strategy for winning the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Against all expectations the winner was a strategy called TIT FOR TAT. This strategy operated according to a simple rule. It started out by cooperating with the other prisoner, but thereafter always copied the other’s move. If he cooperated, TIT FOR TAT cooperated back. If the other prisoner defected, then TIT FOR TAT would defect right back. If you conduct this iterated strategy on the world, you will find that it creates islands of trust and cooperation that slowly grow and eventually take over the world.

You can beat TIT FOR TAT. In 2004 a team of students at Southampton University did it using a strategy of collusion between the prisoners, illuminating why we have laws against price fixing and insider trading.

TIT FOR TAT teaches that you should trust people who have demonstrated their trustworthiness.

But no, we’d rather trust hysterical Senators and Congressmen. When will we ever learn?

Tired Of Being Lied To Yet?

Myths of Iraq[*1] by Ralph Peters:

During a recent visit to Baghdad, I saw an enormous failure. On the part of our media. The reality in the streets, day after day, bore little resemblance to the sensational claims of civil war and disaster in the headlines.

No one with first-hand experience of Iraq would claim the country’s in rosy condition, but the situation on the ground is considerably more promising than the American public has been led to believe. Lurid exaggerations and instant myths obscure real, if difficult, progress.

I left Baghdad more optimistic than I was before this visit. While cynicism, political bias and the pressure of a 24/7 news cycle accelerate a race to the bottom in reporting, there are good reasons to be soberly hopeful about Iraq’s future.

Perhaps if Old Media reporters would stop hiding in their Baghdad hotels (or worse, opining from the comfort of their Atlanta or New York offices) and start listening to those who have actually done real reporting from Iraq, like Michael Yon[*2] , Ralph Peters[*3] , Michael Totten[*4] , and many others, they just might perform a useful public service rather than simply participating in the echo chamber of despair.

Hat tip: Instapundit[*5] .

There Are Heroes

Via Winds of Change[*1] , a story from Newsweek/MSNBC: On Call in Hell[*2] .

Navy doctor Lt. Commander Richard Jadick volunteers to go to Iraq:

The night before the assault, Jadick hopped into a command Humvee taking a reconnaissance mission from the headquarters base outside the city. He wanted to see what he was up against. In treating traumatic injuries, there is something known as the golden hour. A badly injured person who gets to the hospital within an hour is much more likely to be saved. But Jadick knew that in combat the “golden hour” doesn’t exist. Left unaided, said Jadick, the wounded “could die in 15 minutes, and there are some things that could kill them in six minutes. If they had an arterial bleed, it could be three minutes.”

Worth clicking through to the MSNBC site to read the entire article.

Banned by Google?

The People’s Cube[*1] , an anti-Marxist site, appears to have been banned by Google:

Dear comrades at Google:

At some point, quite recently, our popular site “The People’s Cube” (ThePeoplesCube.com) was purged from Google search results. MSN , Yahoo and other search engines still have it – but Google has erased/blocked any link to the site in its database. One can still find links to us from other sites – but not even one from Google to ThePeoplesCube.com. We tried American, French, German, British, Australian, and Russian versions of Google – they used to give us traffic only a few days ago – but all we got was the same line in various languages: Sorry, no information is available for the URL thepeoplescube.com[*2] . And if we clicked on Find web pages from the site thepeoplescube.com we got Your search – site:thepeoplescube.com[*3] – did not match any documents.

Any anti-Marxist site is a friend of Medary.com.

Comment (0)

If It’s So Bad in Iraq . . .

Why are Army National Guard recruiters being so successful[*1] in recruiting? Well, maybe in part because it’s not as bad in Iraq as the Old Media wants you to believe:

A driving force in this year’s early success, Guard leaders say, is that thousands of Guard members have now returned from Iraq and are reaching out to friends, old classmates and co-workers — widening the face-to-face contacts that officials say are critical to recruiting. Guard members “are staying with us and want to fill up units with their neighbors and friends,” Blum said in an interview. “Now that they’re back — watch out.”

The Citizen Soldiers are back, and they’re not happy with Old Media.

Hat tip: American Spectator[*2] .