News. Sports. Fun. Life. (And, it's pronounced muh-DARE-ee)

View Printable Version

"You are a sinner. We all are."

The ridiculousness of the alleged uproar over "Duck Dynasty" personality Phil Robertson hinges largely on the denial, among those who criticize Robertson for his remarks, of the very existence of a thing called "sin."

Of course, this is in itself contradictory, because the criticizers are compelled to purge Robertson from the community of right-thinking people for the sin of believing in a conception of sin which the criticizers do not wish to recognize.

If you're having trouble wrapping your head around that last sentence, don't worry too much about it--that just means that you're fundamentally a sensible person. That's because the position of Robertson's criticizers makes no logical sense, except as a naked appeal to a blatantly bigoted anti-Christian agenda. Which of course puts to the lie the criticizer's attempt to claim the moral high ground of anti-discrimination, since they're fully engaged in religious discrimination--against Christians in this case, and their beliefs--among which is the belief that homosexuality is a sin against God.

What Robertson's criticizers want to say, but don't dare to say quite yet anyway, is that the uncritical acceptance of deviant lifestyles is mandatory in order to participate in civil society--according to the criticizers, anyway. (And please, don't insult my intelligence by trying to claim that homosexuality is not a deviant lifestyle. Biology itself, let alone religion, argues against that. Saying that a behavior is deviant is not in itself a value judgment, by the way. it is simply a slightly more contentious way of stating what is and is not normal behavior--i.e. heterosexual behavior is normal behavior for any species--versus homosexual behavior which for any species, human or otherwise, is not normal behavior. If science bothers you, then that's your problem, not mine.)

Let's move on to some other things that Robertson said, that his criticizers are bound and determined to ignore. Let's have a look, shall we?
“We never, ever judge someone on who’s going to heaven, hell. That’s the Almighty’s job. We just love ’em, give ’em the good news about Jesus—whether they’re homosexuals, drunks, terrorists. We let God sort ’em out later, you see what I’m saying?”

Now, most people will see what they want to see in that quote, but try very, very, very hard to focus on the first two sentences, and the first clause of the third sentence.


The words of a hater, obviously.

So forgive me if I don't join the lynch mob. One side is screaming for somebody's hide. The other side is saying "we'll just try to love people and let God sort things out." One side is for the worst sort of ideological purity tests, the other side is for tolerance and compassion. One side says "We're all sinners" and the other side seems hell-bent on proving them right.

Which side you really want to be on?
View Printable Version

Air Force Band goes flash-mob at Smithsonian

via IJReview

View Printable Version

If you like your web site, you can keep it. If not . . .

Photo credit The Daily News (Memphis, TN), click on link for full story and larger picture.

I wonder if in the "Dummies" series there are the titles Governing for Dummies, American Political Philosophy for Dummies and Obeying The Very Law You Do-Gooding Twits And Idiots Yourselves Passed 'In Order To See What's In It' for Dummies.

Perhaps we could take up a collection and buy for Obama and his administration the complete set. Not that it would actually do a lot of good with this bunch, I'm afraid. But it's the thought that counts, isn't it?
View Printable Version

Fascist is as fascist does

Definition, from The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics:
As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer.
. . .
Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it.

See also:

Image scraped from Andrew Malcom's Twitter feed.
View Printable Version

It's dead, Barry . . .

Obamacare aka the "Affordable Care Act" is an unmitigated disaster. Many people who think they’ve signed up for a plan actually have not.

It is stillborn. But like a bereaved mother, its backers clutch its lifeless body to themselves, murmuring softly to it and urging it to suckle. But to no avail.

It's dead, Jim.

View Printable Version

Baby Turtles

View Printable Version

Friday Night Links

Sure. Why not?

3 Ways You Know BuzzFeed Is Taking Your Stuff

Missouri Lawmakers Override Veto to Enact Good Samaritan Law -- Yes, out-of-state doctors can now legally provide medical services to Missouri poor and inner-city people. No, they could not have done so before. Yes, the Democrat Governor of Missouri vetoed the bill to allow doctors to be doctors in Missouri. Yes, the Republican legislature of Missouri overrode the veto. Tell me again which party cares more about the poor?

And Now We Dither . . . -- Incompetence combined with a tragically mistaken worldview has its consequences.

The Death of Gun Control

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emmanuel apologizes for decades of police torture -- Hmm. What political party has been so dominant in Chicago that it's commonly referred to as a "machine?" Do you suppose maybe that's not a real good idea?

This Depressing Economy: It's far closer to the dreadful 1930s than you might think.

Chicago Ends Gun Registration Requirement -- Not voluntarily, mind you . . . forced to recognize citizen's rights by Federal courts. Hmm. Which party dominated Southern slave-holding states before the Civil War? Hint: Not the Republicans. That other party is all too willing to ignore large swaths of the Constitution when they find them inconvenient. Do you suppose maybe that's not a real good idea?

Gallup: Number of Americans Who Trust Government To Fix Country’s Problems At All-Time Low…

American Ineffectualism: Every American ally is cringing with embarrassment at the amateurishness of the last month.

Rush Limbaugh Producer: Mainstream Media Want to Take Down Champions of Conservatism -- That producer, who's had the job for many years now, is black, by the way.

Legendary Rock Star Eviscerates Media in Powerful Defense of Tim Tebow: ‘They’re A**holes’

Democrats block resolution to create joint select committee to investigate Benghazi

Yeah. That's enough. For a LONG time.

I'll be back when I can stomach some more of this . . .
View Printable Version

Truth, redux

Oh, my.

Ace. Of Ace of Spades HQ fame.

Ace comments:
I never doubt the equality of the sexes until I read Feminists.

Yeah. I'm there. I'm totally down with the equality of the sexes thing, until I get a snootful of doctrinaire, activist "feminist" rhetoric, which is nothing but tiresome, warmed over politics-of-envy and Marxist dogma (but I repeat myself).

See, that's why Ace is firmly ensconced in the second or third tier of big-time bloggers, and I'm . . . well . . . I post stuff, every once in a while. He's able to pound out a thousand-word-plus post inspired by this nonsense, and I am--significantly more taciturn. Sometimes I think I have an insufficiently disdainful view of my fellow men. And women.

OK, I often think my view of mankind in general is insufficiently disdainful. Hey, what can I say? I'm an optimist . . .
View Printable Version


Watch this.


And watch this too.

You are being lied to. Constantly. Repeatedly. By people who have no honor or shame, and who believe totally that "the ends justify the means."

And the ends they seek are nothing less than re-instituting a sort of 12th-Century feudalism--with themselves as the feudal lords, and you, the "middle class" as the serfs. Of course, this is all for your own good, or so they say.

Slavery is always a good idea if you're the one holding the whip and the end of the chain. Those who wear the shackles and feel the whip on their backs may, at some point, come to have a differing and politically incorrect, non-MSNBC/DNC-approved opinion, however.
View Printable Version

Obamacare: Bottom Line

Item 1: My personal health care insurance premium will be 20.79% more expensive next policy year (starting September 1, 2013) than it was this past year. And since it is an individual policy (I'm retired and not a member of a group) it was already plenty expensive.

Item 2: The official name of the Obamacare legislation is "The Affordable Care Act." Raising insurance rates by over 20% is an exotic and novel application of the word "affordable" that I myself would not have thought of. That's probably why I'm not a politician. I can't lie smoothly enough.

Item 3: My personal physician a dedicated health professional who started as a nurse before getting a medical degree and becoming a general practitioner, is abandoning general practice of medicine to go into the specialty of bariatrics. She had previously been an independent physician but that independence was impossible to financially sustain and had to seek affiliation with a physician's network. That network--in no small part because of the requirements of the Affordable Care Act--is now in the unenviable position of essentially requiring its member physicians to abandon general practice and go into specialties.

It's every bit the disaster I thought it would be. No politician who voted for this monstrosity should ever be considered for public office again (and should probably be investigated by appropriate grand juries or special prosecutors--but you can say that for most every politician, regardless of their view on Obamacare, can't you?)

User Functions

Lost your password?

Want to comment?

Click Here for instructions.

What's New


2 new Stories in the last 2 days

Comments last 7 days

No new comments

Links last 2 weeks

No recent new links

RSS and Blogroll

Blogroll Me!