Contributed by: filbert Saturday, November 28 2009 @ 08:12 PM CST
I don't think you could pay me enough money to watch what will likely be the most grotesque parody of serious political discussion since . . . well, since the CNN/YouTube Democratic Presidential Debate.
And no, I didn't debase myself by watching the Democratic one, either.
Upon further consideration, you probably could pay me enough money . . . but we're talking at least ten figures here. And that still wouldn't make me LIKE it.
UPDATE: Was I right, or was I right?
According to the industry magazine Advertising Age[*1] , I seem to have been right.
Again, I don't know that it's necessarily wrong to have opponents show up during these forums. But the problem for CNN is that it didn't do the same for the Democratic YouTube debate and it's just coming off a Las Vegas debate where it seemingly pushed a student to ask Hillary Clinton that ridiculous diamonds or pearls question[*2] (and included James Carville in the post-debate analysis). Like George W. Bush finding out which 30% of the country still supports them, then doing something to frustrate even those voters, CNN seems intent on finding its few remaining Republican voters and driving them into the arms of Fox News. (You just have to take a quick glance at Drudge to see how this is being played on the right.)(Emphasis mine. Hat tip Instapundit[*3] .)